Carol Garboden Murray, M.Ed.
Join the Illuminating Care Facebook Page!
  • Home
  • Articles
  • ILLUMINATING CARE
  • 7 lamps of care
  • Blog
  • Sign Language
  • Contact

Why I don't teach 4 year olds to "Raise Your Hand"

8/2/2022

10 Comments

 
Picture

Is raising your hand a DAP way to teach respect?

A few months ago a colleague asked me why I don't expect our preschoolers (age 3-5) to learn to raise their hand during group gatherings. I explained that I want our gatherings to be authentic joyful groups for sharing story, song, and conversation. I said that I've noticed that when teachers focus on strict "raise your hand" protocol the conversation is diminished.  The focus of gathering tends to become about training children in hand raising. When children are trained in this way, the dynamic of give and take seems to be primarily a ping pong between a child and a teacher, and a teacher and a child, rather than an authentic circle of conversation between peers. I've noticed it also turns into copy cat responses from children. They sit there waving their hand, not paying attention, but primarily worried about their weary arm - and then when they are called upon they don't know what to say. 

Large group conversations with preschoolers are not easy - it takes practice, but it can become a beautiful flow of give and take and listening between peers when teachers have intentionally listened to children, modeled wait time, and coached children in this process of thinking and listening and responding to one another in a caring community.  Smaller group conversations can happen at the beginning of the year as a way to practice - at snack time and lunch time, and of course, during play time. Intentional practices can be put in place such as using phrases like, "It looks like we need to move on now, but I am writing your words down here on this sticky note so we can return to this conversation" or, "I see there are many children who have ideas bursting out - lets listen to Evan then Hazel and then Samu next. There is a lot of excitement in the air and I really want to hear everyone's voice." Co-teachers and assistant teachers can support the group and act as scribes, and teaching teams can decide on how best to record children's ideas, and then how to return to these ideas to let the conversation keep layering and growing.  Sign language is good too. A teacher can introduce visual cues that become part of the conversation culture such as using signs for key words like  - "Let's 'stop' and 'wait' and 'think' together.  When the excitement of the group bubbles over to the point nearing chaos - I never feel it is time to squelch the enthusiasm, but rather to find ways to pause, to harness the enlivened interests, and give everyone voice. Some teachers have said that introducing something to hold, like a talking stick, can help too.

In a classrooms where teachers are listening more than talking, taking children's ideas seriously, and making space for children's voices, children's conversation skills grow. Much of this skillful teaching happens in the larger gatherings with artful eye contact, body language, anticipatory facial expressions, and hands placed on backs or hands held for the children who are extra impulsive and always want to talk. The teacher holds the intention to lift everyone's voice and to honor listening. Teachers become attuned to what each student needs to be able to participate, and through this modeling, children get the deepest lessons in conversation, internal control, and perspective taking. The really good conversations seem to center emotionally charged situations for the 4 and 5 year olds who are developing their sense of justice and perspective taking. These conversations are never fill-in-the-blank-right-or-wrong answer kinds of dialogues.  

For early childhood gatherings, I believe our best programs are built on a model of child development rather than a model of schoolification that holds the goal of training kids to stand in lines or raise their hands.  I have heard others say that teaching children to stand in lines and raise their hands are central ways that children learn to take turns and respect others, but I have never found these traditional school management techniques to  be ways that respect what it means to be a young child engaged in a culture of caring.  What do you think? 

10 Comments

Care and the Myth of Independence

7/23/2022

1 Comment

 
Picture
On the pathway towards independence, children fluctuate between feeling big and feeling little. One day they pretend to be powerful super heroes saving the world, and the next day they become helpless kittens curled up on their teacher’s lap. It is exciting to grow up, but it’s also perplexing and a little bit scary.
Children express their ambivalence by pulling us close, and then pushing us away. We’ve all witnessed the determination of a toddler who proclaims, “I do it by myself” and it is easy to assume that when this autonomy is expressed so boldly, that the child is on their way to self-sufficiency. But independence is a tricky concept, and in the next growth spurt, the child becomes clingy and fearful, and we wonder –  is the child regressing? Why has it become a power struggle for them to dress themselves? Why do they still need my care?

When I see this mercurial behavior in children, acting both self-reliant and needy, I think it eloquently symbolizes the universal push and pull all humans experience  – the dance between our independence and our interdependence.

Often when children most need our care, it is not because they are physically vulnerable, but because they are asking the bigger psychological and philosophical questions about human life  - what does it mean to grow and change? Am I alone? Who am I in response to another? How much power do I really have? Who loves me? How are we connected?  What is the relational nature of life?

Our society and our educational systems place such a high value on independence, that sometimes we forget to value care. When children require our care, it is associated with neediness which is coupled with weakness, instead of the recognition that care is a beautiful and vital part of our humanness.

The notion of rugged individualism is really a myth. Even if we think we’ve reached the pinnacle, the adult state of independence, we must still acknowledge that our survival and success is always reliant upon someone else; the farmer who grows our food, the grocery store where we shop, the transportation system, and the care infrastructure that allows us to work and live, to name a few.  

We are all needy! There has always been a network of care that supports us, and for many years, most everyone free rode off women who cared for children and elders and made it possible for men to work and achieve.

The paradox of identity development is that we can’t do it alone. It is only through the response of the other that we find ourselves.

Care should not be held in contrast to independence and strength. It is time to push against the notion that care is a soft skill. As Nel Noddings says, “Care is the strong back bone of society”.  To be human is to follow our natural urge towards individualization and sovereignty while recognizing the seed of our personal power grows from community, cooperation, and care.

Imagine how our educational systems could change if we integrated care ethics into our pedagogy and practice. What if we explicitly analyzed the same questions young children ask at the beginning of life in their push and pull towards independence – the big questions about the relational nature of being human.  What if caring was taken seriously as an educational goal and objective; caring for one another, for our children, our elders, our community, our planet?
​
Care looks differently at each stage of life, but care is what builds the foundation for self-worth, perspective taking, and empathy. These are the vital building blocks of a strong society.  Care offers all the conditions for progressive education and self-actualization. Care is not subordinate to education, care is education.


Carol Garboden Murray, Author of Illuminating Care, The Pedagogy and Practice of Care in Early Childhood Communities, Exchange Press, 2021.
1 Comment

Let's Rescue Care!

7/14/2022

2 Comments

 
Picture
Throughout my career, I heard this message, "Don’t talk about care.” At conferences and leadership institutes, I was told, “You will never be understood or respected if you use care to describe your work. Don’t call your school a child care center, call it an early learning center. You are more than just child care, and you should use the language of education.”

But care was the thing that fascinated me the most in my study of human development. I recognized the false dichotomy that education and care were separate. I wasn’t willing to rank care, hide care, or disguise care. I wanted to name care and to show that even the most basic rituals of caring between adult and child require dignity, respect, presence, dialogue, and intelligence.

Early childhood is the original care, and so as a first teacher, I have had the opportunity to practice and analyze care. I have written a book about care, not just because I want to take good care of children, but also because I believe that care offers a way of encountering the other—an ethical model for relationships that we can apply to the whole span of life. 

We are connected through care and dependency throughout the arc of our life. Care looks different at each stage of life, but care always builds the foundation for self-worth, for perspective-taking, for empathy. These are not soft skills—these are the vital building blocks of a strong humanity. Care offers all the conditions for progressive education and self-actualization. Care is the next frontier for achieving work-family balance and gender equality. Care is a basic human need, a public good, and a human right. I believe we need to analyze care, and practice care more than ever before because in our country we are in the midst of a care crisis. 

Care is endangered by programs that place inappropriate goals and misguided expectations on children and their teachers. Even in early childhood settings where care is assumed, care is most often an afterthought, and responsive care is neglected as an intentional teaching practice. Care is suffering because we have not shown its value as a public good in our country. Working families cannot afford high quality care for their children. The average annual cost of child care for one child in most states is more than the cost of a mortgage and is approaching parity with the cost of college tuition. Care is burdened because the underfunded care system has resulted in extremely low pay for early childhood teachers, many of whom are earning poverty wages.


It will take courage to face the care crisis. It will take courage to challenge the notion that care is subordinate to education or that care is women’s work and a private family matter. It will take courage to lift care from an association with weakness and fragility and align care with strength and power. It will take courage to show that caring is not custodial work that just anybody can do, but caring is an art and a science, and an honorable profession requiring much knowledge and many skills. It will take courage to free care from gender roles, and make care attractive to men and women, to all people, and to position care as a human right and a public good. It will take courage to illuminate care.
​

During the global health crisis our whole world has paused, as our interconnectedness as humans has been highlighted like never before. The way we emerge from this moment in history will be dependent upon the way we care for one another. I believe that together we can rescue care and I believe that care can rescue us. 

Preview Illuminating Care here, https://exchangepress.com/catalog/product/illuminating-care/3600582/

2 Comments

Care: The elegance of a child drinking from a glass

7/11/2022

2 Comments

 
Picture
During COVID child care we made changes to our traditional care rituals - especially those around meals. To minimize teacher prep time, reduce high touch surfaces, and increase sanitation around meals we stopped doing our family style snacks and asked families to send in brown paper bag snacks and water bottles each morning.  I really miss our family style shared morning snacks and I am looking forward to getting back to it. I just found these sweet vintage jelly jar glasses and can't wait to see them in the hands of children.

It is good to teach children to drink from a an open cup quite early. Teachers report that more and more children are delayed in drinking from a cup because of our water bottle and sippy-cup culture. Drinking from a cup supports oral motor skills and ushers in the ease and mastery of other important tools - such as getting the spoon or fork to the lips.

Children are still learning how to control hand gradation from firm to gentle grasps and they will crumble plastic or paper cups with their small fists. Small metal or plastic cups are better for giving the child the firm feedback to support learning this new skills - and there's nothing quite as pleasing as drinking from glass. 

Drinking from an open glass or cup is different than drinking from a sippy or a water bottle. Young children who drink from sippy-cups habitualize throwing their heads back to allow liquid to flow, while drinking from a cup actually requires the skill of holding the head relatively level while the hand and head work together to coordinate just the right flow of liquid into the mouth.

To think of care as an art, invites us to place attention on the materials of care, and meals offer such rich possibilities. When we value care, we find luxury in the simplicity of every day items. The art of care need not be flowery or decorative - the sophistication of real objects shows an honest respect for care that can elevate routines to educational experiences. We can see the beauty in the authenticity of daily living and witness the miracle of the mundane as the child learns to tip a cup and take a drink.


2 Comments

Via Negativa: Seeking a creative enlivened teaching life

5/26/2021

4 Comments

 
Picture

I first heard the phrase Via Negativa from the poet David Whyte  As he would describe it, Via Negativa is what we must say NO to in life to find the next step that serves our deeper unfolding.

Years ago I was attending a workshop by Gretchen Kinnel (author of Good Going) and she said that humans learn the most from non-examples. This statement piqued my attention and got me thinking. The next day I was interviewing a new teacher for a position in our child care program and as I told her about our philosophy,  how we build strong relationships, and value play, she quietly nodded and smiled. But, It wasn't until I gave non-examples and I said, "We don't do worksheets, calendar time or the weather chart," that I saw her eyes widened and she began to ask meaningful questions that led us into a deep conversation about early childhood education. 

"Via negativa" is a way of understanding that when we don't know exactly what we want or need, we can usually identify what we don't want.

Sometimes we take the next step in our life by moving away from what we know for sure we must stand against.

Maybe we hold a memory within us of a horrible teacher we had as a child, or a hurtful experience we had in school, and that  guides us by the power of "via negative" to create something very different for the children in our charges. 

Living a creative life with children requires us to walk in the dark. We have to be brave to take the next step not really knowing where it will lead. When we care for and teach young children, we don't follow a guide book or a how-to-manual. We follow relationship planning rather than lesson planning (Ron Lally). We are making decisions moment by moment and day by day and we live in a state of openness - expecting the challenge, the delight, the surprise, and the unknown to guide us.  

The compass we use to navigate a teaching life is made of many things - we have our knowledge of child development to guide us, we have our respect for the culture of childhood to point us in the right direction, and sometimes we lean on "via negativa" too. For example when we are challenged and puzzled by a child's behavior and grappling with the next step, we don't know exactly what to do, but we do know for sure that we must avoid shame and we must step away from the power struggle at all costs (via negativa). 

Maybe you feel stuck in your teaching practice and you are not quite sure how to make a more enlivened habitat for children and for yourself.  The first step in changing your course might be in stepping away from what feels flat or uninspired. Creativity and engaged learning comes from having an original new direction. You can start working on moving towards that unchartered territory by leaving behind what you believe isn't serving children's best interest anymore. 

A few years ago at my school we asked ourselves what purpose "circle time" served. If we really believe young children learn through choices, social interaction, movement and play, what do they get from circle time?  I started studying children's faces and body posture and taking an observational measurement of their engagement during circle time.  When the teachers read informational instructional books or tried to do whole group lessons or a big language chart experience, I generally saw kids writhing, or looking out the window, or poking their peers, or picking their noses. This was quite a contrast to what I saw when teachers told good stories or let the children be the story tellers.  What I saw during storytelling and song was pure joy, intense listening, and fully body participation.

What we decided to do was to step away from viewing circle time as "instruction time" and to re-name it "our gathering".  Via Negativa was our guide because first we saw what wasn't working and we stepped away from it.   

This also dramatically changed the teaching experience. We subtracted what wasn't working and we named story and song as our primary goal for gathering. Instead of being worried about group management, teachers were free to focus on becoming excellent story tellers, reflecting upon how to guide children into their own storytelling, and working together to curate a beautiful diverse collection of songs for our gathering sing-alongs.

If you've ever had the delight of telling a story you love to tell and seeing 16 children gazing at you with care and hanging on your every word - you can imagine the difference the teachers felt by claiming their identity as expert story tellers, rather than circle time managers. 

Sometimes we find our NO before we find our YES.  Via negativa can keep us out of the gutter, keep us from repeating negative patterns, and push us towards new frontiers in teaching and caring.



4 Comments

Calendar-time represents the early childhood teachers' collective identity crisis

5/15/2021

17 Comments

 
Picture

Early childhood teachers are suffering from a collective identity crisis. For years, we've been standing in defense, trying to justify our profession by borrowing language and imagery that is not our own. We've been trying to align with K-12 teachers, and while doing so, we have reached outside of our field to use someone else's language, imagery, and practice in attempt to show that we are "real" teachers.

Although we know that the child learns the most meaningful and critical lessons through play and care - we have believed that we must look like "school" and we must describe learning in academic categories and standards to be included in the educational discourse. Because we live in a society that doesn't really respect the culture of childhood, we have had to borrow language and imagery that doesn't match childhood, and doesn't align with the unique foundational work we do. We've borrowed charts and calendars to try to climb up that false hierarchy that says the older the person you teach, the more important your work becomes, as if teaching college is the imagined pinnacle of respect, so teaching babies, toddlers and young children must be at the bottom.

Calendar time is one of those images that early childhood teachers have adopted from school culture. It originally came from a K-2 curriculum of the 1970s called, "Math-Their-Way". The developmentalist, Mary Barrata Lorton, who wrote Math Their Way, would be horrified to see the way calendars are being used in preschool today as a symbol of education. Within her math approach, the calendar ritual with it's numbers and alternating patterns, wasn't even introduced until the middle of kindergarten or first grade. Mary's focus for Math instruction was about teaching with manipulatives and loose parts to discourage elementary teachers from using worksheets or introducing symbols too early. The way she introduced the calendar as a real life graphic tool was just one small part of the Math Their Way Curriculum, and was never about memorizing days of the week, or quizzing kids on temporal concepts like yesterday, today or tomorrow.  

I am not going to write about all the reasons the calendar, that has become a quintessential image in so many early childhood classrooms, is a miss-leading visual that has no pedagogical foundation for our three, four and five year olds. I don't want to talk here about how the calendar time routine steals children's time and disregards the way young children learn sequencing, numbers, patterning, symbols, counting, or literacy. If you are ready to throw out the calendar and liberate yourself, your program, and your children - you will find all the rationale you need to do so on your own by turning to the many play based child advocates who have been speaking out against it for years.

It is one thing to complain that no one understands early childhood teachers or respects our youngest citizens  - and it is quite another thing to contribute to the misunderstanding and disregard by participating in the collective false identity. We can no longer hide behind the abc charts and the days of the week graphs. It is time to be the bold early childhood professionals that children need and deserve. 

In the past, seeing the big pocket calendar in the early childhood classroom may have sent a message to someone that this is a place of "learning".  In the emerging future, seeing the big calendar in the early childhood classroom sends a message that the teachers do not have a strong identity as early childhood practitioners.  I don't want to be harsh or critical of any individual who has been teaching young children in a world that is out of balance -and in a society of ridiculously inadequate support. I just want you to know that the things that you hold closest to your heart - the way you care for children at arrival, and the way you sit with them during meal times, the way you care about the child's play and inquiry - every interaction you have with the child is powerful. Your care is the treasure trove of teaching and learning.  I want to shine a light on your care and hold it up as a model of education.  I want to free you from needing to prove that you are a teacher with images that do not reach the child who sits on your lap. I want to rescue us all and facilitate a collective recovery from the identity crisis that has plagued our profession.  I want to reach back into the nucleus of care  and invent a new language to describe the pedagogy of care to articulate what quality teaching and learning looks like when it emerges from a relationship of trust that respects the culture of childhood. 

Throwing out the calendar is a perfect way to begin to claim your identity as a first teacher who works with new humans who learn and grow in relationship, through play, care, movement, experimentation and mess making. We can be proud of our honorable work as caregivers, play facilitators, companions, story tellers, social coaches and family partners in child growth.

We don't need to contrive education by sitting in front of a calendar when we have the privilege of introducing children to the awe of nature, clay, paint, blocks, sand, water and mud. It would be absurd to recite the days of the week and months of the year when we can teach the joy of song, rhythm, poetry, story and the marvel of their own fantasy, the wonder of friendship, and the beauty of relationship.

Care is education. Play is education.  No one will ever respect us or understand us unless we proudly name and show who we are. We will never be free from the collective identity crisis until we stop borrowing and adopting practices, language, and images that are not our own and that do not rise to meet the brilliance of the young children we hold in our arms.​

Together, let's rescue care and care will rescue us. Care is our strength. We can start the care revolution from the inside out.  We can do this. 


17 Comments

But, I know you can DO IT BY YOURSELF: Care & Power Struggles

5/9/2021

4 Comments

 
Picture




​I recently witnessed a new teacher struggling with a child over putting on his shoes. The conversation went something like this:
Child: Help me put my shoe on.
Teacher: I know you can do it yourself.
Child: But I want you to help me.
Teacher: I’ve seen you do it before and I know you are very capable.
Child: (falling to the floor in tears) I can’t do it!

After a few minutes of crying and sprawling in the middle of the cubby room another teacher stepped and said, “What’s happening here?” and the new teacher explained, the child is crying because he wants me to put his shoes on for him even though I know he can do it himself. The second teacher knelt down and said to the new teacher and the child, “Would it be okay if I helped?” and the child nodded.  She said, “Let’s see, you look pretty sad, I wonder what we should do first? How about if I put on one shoe, and you do the other one?” The child nodded again, and she proceeded to gently put his shoe on while handing him the other one. He quickly wiped his eyes, jumped up and finished the job and got his coat on, too.

In a follow up conversation with the teachers, we talked about care rituals at cubby time. The new teacher expressed her frustration, saying that she really believed that if the second teacher would have just let the boy cry it out, he would have eventually gotten his shoes on. I agreed with her that this child is very capable, and I asked her to talk a bit more about her goals and hopes for children around self-help skills. She told us that she believes that children are capable and that if we do everything for them, we will be taking away their chance for independence. The second teacher and I supported her beliefs and agreed with her, that independence is an important program goal. We also explained how crucial it is to support one another as team members, and sometimes a team member can step in when there seems to be a power struggle brewing—we didn’t intend for this to be an instance of one teacher undermining another, but rather a way for a team to be supportive and a more experienced teacher to offer a model for scaffolding. 

This conversation opened up many good points about care and independence. The three of us talked about why children who are very capable might still want us to care for them, and how we can support them by being a partner—sometimes when a child does not want to do it him self, even just sitting down next to him and walking him through the steps is a way to be supportive. In this instance, offering to do the first step bolstered him to do the rest all by himself, like we knew he could. This would have been different if the second teacher would have scooped him up and held him in her arms like a baby and put his shoes on for him. That would have been over-care. That would have reinforced his sadness and enabled him. But, she didn’t shield him from his own frustration—she acknowledged his feelings and looked for a way to pull him out of the hole he was digging for himself.


I have seen many teachers who are insistent upon teaching independence fall into power struggles with children over dressing or hand washing or toileting. What I have witnessed is that power struggles of withholding care often lead to a feeling of abandonment, and can be examples of under-care. We have found that the struggles are easily avoided if the teachers slow down during care rituals, and often just being present and acknowledging the challenges alongside children, while children are caring for themselves, is enough to support them in all the steps.

When a child says, “I can’t do it” and we say, “Oh yes you can!” we are offering an opposing view and immediately inviting a challenge.  When a child says, “I can’t do it” and we say, “Hmm.. I wonder what you mean?” or “It looks like you are frustrated”, or "Sounds like you'd really like my help today" we show that we respect care as not only a physical task, but also an emotional meeting of two people.  Care is an invitation.

For the most part, children are fiercely independent, and we see their natural urges to “do it by myself.” We see their capacity and capabilities clearly, so why is it that they sometimes revert to needing or wanting our help, during caring rituals? Although we can only speculate, I believe there are many emotional explanations: It feels good to have someone else care for you, putting on your own shoes is a lot of work, and more work for some children with organizational challenges, children miss home, care rituals remind them of mom and dad, children feel ambivalent about growing up, but can’t express these subconscious fears except through behavior and children are seeking connection with the people around them.

Again, I want to make clear that partnering with children to avoid under-care is very different than an approach that coddles children and robs them of their opportunity to feel pride in autonomy and accomplishment. We can see each child as capable and also remember that they have been on this planet for three or four years—and we can be sure that helping them put on their coat or shoes will not prevent them from becoming adults who can do this on their own.

In this instance, I ask us all to take a few moments to reflect upon our own care needs as adults. Think about how good you feel when a friend makes you a salad or a bowl of soup. Doesn’t it just taste better when you didn’t have to make it yourself and someone else served it to you? Imagine standing in the sun on a humid day and having a friend or partner offer you an ice cold drink—what a caring gesture and how much more refreshing the drink is, knowing it came from someone who is noticing your needs and caring for your well-being.  We all appreciate this kind of care, no matter how old we are.

A few nights ago, I stayed up late writing in my pajamas at the dining room table. When I finally got into bed I didn’t realize how cold my feet had gotten and I started to complain about my toes being ice cubes. My husband got up and found some of his own wool socks and put them on me. As he tugged the socks up over my ankles, I felt like a kid and I thought, “When is the last time someone has put my socks on for me?” I
t made me reflect upon care and comfort and independence. How often do I let others care for me? With this reflection my awareness for care was heightened. I started noticing care everywhere—when I went out to eat at a restaurant I noticed the gentle gracious way the waitress placed my plate in front of me; when I got my groceries, I noticed the way the bagger helped me load my cart; when I rushed into the bank on a rainy afternoon, I noticed the woman who held the door for me. Care is all around us, and opening our eyes to it allows us to receive. Care is reciprocal and we are always connected to one another, and need one another, even when we can "do it by ourselves".  Moving through the world with this simple awareness is a form of self-care.

Carol Garboden Murray
Illuminating Care: The Pedagogy & Practice of Care



​

4 Comments

Self care and community care - how do we care? how do we fail?

12/6/2020

3 Comments

 
Picture

Two years ago I drove to a neighboring state with a teacher friend to attend a professional development night hosted in a Reggio Emilia inspired school. As the director gave us a tour of the classroom walls lined with photos and quotes of children engaged in emergent projects, she explained how the preschool teachers had worked on the documentation on their own time. She admitted to us that she expected this kind of reflective work at her school, but she hadn't figured out how to schedule coverage or pay for preparation and documentation time for her teaching team. When she made this admission, my mind froze. I couldn't pay attention to anything else for the rest of the evening. I was stuck in a downward spiral of thought that went something like this, "No way! This is abusive. Reggio Emilia educators would never endorse this kind of treatment of early childhood teachers. A central purpose of reflection and documentation is to professionalize our work, and to show the intelligence of the children and teachers collaborators. How do well intentioned people get so off track?"  My heart was heavy and filled with righteous indignation. I thought of my many colleagues who have told me similar stories of teaching and caring in beautiful private progressive schools where they work with no health care and make half, at best, the salary of public school teachers. I thought of a young teacher I met at a child care council training a few days earlier who told me she worked a 9 hour shift daily because her director gave her a hour unpaid lunch break so she could stretch her shift to cover both the opening and closing hours, in the name of providing children consistency.  I thought of the job posting I had recently seen at a well known, well endowed, college seeking someone with a degree in early childhood development to work for  $13 an hour in an infant toddler center.  

As much as we each have a responsibility to ourselves to make a firm commitment to self care, the whole notion of self care is hollow if we don't exist in communities where it is possible. If we rely upon the ethics of care to guide our work as teachers and caregivers, we always come back to our dependency upon one another. It takes a community of care to find the ground where we can practice true balanced healthy self care.  Self care starts with self respect, and if we work in institutions and systems that neglect to operate with care as a core value, and refuse basic rights of care workers, we are all doomed to abuse ourselves, mistreat one another, and diminish care itself. 

In the spring when we were at the beginning of COVID, a viral facebook post by community organizer, Nakita Valerio, urged people to rethink self care when she said, "Shouting 'self care' at people who actually need community care is how we fail people." Although Nakita was responding to the horrific New Zealand attack, her messages struck a chord with child care teachers and all the care workers across our nation who were being called heroes while simultaneously being asked to show up as essential workers with low wages, and with minimal to no protections, through the pandemic. This moment in our history has illuminated the way our nation really treats care and how disrespectfully it responds to those people at the center of the caring hub that holds the world together. 

Now is the time to re-imagine care. I believe it must start from the inside out, from caring for ourselves and from treating care as an honorable profession, but we can't do this alone - we need a community of care around us.

If you want to think about this more deeply with me, check out this article, Beyond Self Care: Understanding Community Care and Why It's Important, and join me next week when I will discuss the history of the labor movement and the link between child care and servitude and slavery and when I ask, "How does the care movement become a social justice movement?

​​







​

3 Comments

Masks can't hide emotional intelligence and the drive to connect

10/13/2020

0 Comments

 
 I felt intense grief and disbelief when I first put on a mask to go grocery shopping this summer after stay at home orders were lifted. It was so strange to muzzle my mouth and my smile. Surprisingly, as I stepped back into my routine of Saturday morning grocery shopping it didn't take long to noticed how happy I was to see my favorite checker, David.  In all my years of shopping at Hannaford's, we had never talked beyond shallow pleasantries, but now we found ourselves chatting like old friends - the masks didn't break our connection, rather it forced us to connect with our conversation and by what felt like our hearts.  While my groceries rolled by me on the conveyor belt, I learned that David has 5 siblings, he is a favorite uncle for a big crew of nieces and nephews, he is saving all his money to buy a new lap top, and he is planning to go back to college next year to study design. As I pushed my cart through the parking lot, back to my car and pulled my mask down for a breath of fresh air, I instantly knew I would be okay. I felt connected. I knew we would find a way to teach and care even with masks on.

We spent a good deal of time worrying about the effects of mask wearing on young children this summer as we prepared to reopen. In NY State at the preschool program I lead, all the adults are required to wear masks at all times. Sometimes we've experimented with clear masks and face shields and at times these alternatives are especially helpful (such as during story time when we really want the children to see our expressions) but mostly, given that we are working at least 8 hours a day, we have just adapted in a matter-of-fact-way to putting on a mask to go to work. We seek the most comfortable mask we can find, give each other masks breaks, and change our masks a couple of times during the day to freshen up.  

What's amazing is how well the children have adapted. Not only have they adapted, but they are teaching us about their own innate social-emotional intelligence. My friend Shelley who is also teaching preschool with a mask on says that sometimes she plays a game where she pulls down her masks to reveal her funny exaggerated emotion and kids laugh and say "Yep- I knew your face would look happy (or surprised or sad).  She explained that kids seem to tune into her and check in to see emotional state even more than she had previously realized.  Children are always watching our eyes - our gaze holds incredible power to convey care and love and respect.  Children also tune into our tone of voice, our gestures, our body language, our stance. These are all the subtle ways we communicate with children and with one another.  Wearing a mask forces us to strengthen our expressive art of caring.

As I've been wearing a mask this fall, I've been thinking about care as the first literacy of life. It is through our touch and our gaze during care rituals - feeding, rocking, holding, dressings - through the first human caring exchange, that our children listen to our unspoken messages and connect through the language of our care. I believe this language is not only conveyed through what is seen (through the gaze) and what is felt (through the hands and body) but also through what is sensed (through the heart). Howard Gardener teaches us about children's inter and intra-personal intelligences.  He describes how children have heightened abilities to sense and intuit their way through social interactions and how they hold awareness of self and other.  Howard Gardener even went on to describe another kind of intelligence - one he calls existential intelligence which involves the child's ability to go beyond what is seen and heard. Yes, we know what he is talking about because when we care for young children we go beyond what is seen and heard - we experience this existential intelligence regularly.  As I marvel at the children, I ask not how we as humans learn empathy, awareness, and connection but how is it that we lose these things?
0 Comments

Let's Liberate Care!

10/11/2020

7 Comments

 
Picture
As an early childhood teacher and leader, I have been told in the past, not to talk about care to describe my work.  At conferences and leadership institutes I have been advised to use the language of academia to demonstrate how children learn.  The message has been, “Others will think you are just babysitting if you talk about care. You need to show that you are above that. Don’t call your school a child care center, rather call it an early learning institute. You are more than care.” 

Embedded in this message is the notion that the older the person you teach, the more respect you earn.  College professors and high school teachers are really “teaching”, while those that care for babies, toddlers and young children are at the bottom of the educational hierarchy.  We’ve been told to reach up into schools for categories like math, science and literacy to give child care legitimacy. Even within our own field, we’ve been forced to use these terms to achieve accreditation and recognition. 


Another implicit message we internalize when we disguise the care of children with academic categories is captured in this quote from David Hawkins, “Much of our zeal for reform in early education is consistent with the interpretation that we don’t really like children and we want them to grow up as soon as possible” (D Hawkins, The Informed Vision).   The language and systems we have been asked to use are not born from within, they are borrowed, and they don’t respect or see truly the unique stage of life called early childhood.  They push down, they pressure, they hurry, they confine.  They causes us to subjugate child life, and to place children and their care subordinate to what is thought of as academics learning.

 In my career, I have learned to talk the talk and I know how to pin academic standards on just about every aspect of child care and early human development.  When I see the three year old sitting at the table eating snack, I can tell you how she is using her proprioceptive intelligence to find her seat, to hold herself in a healthy posture while she also uses both hands to pour her own water, strengthening her attention and her brain development as she crosses midline.  I can tell you about the sequencing and the fine motor skills she practices while she uses a small knife to spread humus on her cracker. I can describe the language and vocabulary lessons embedded as she shares conversation with her teachers and peers.  Most importantly, I can describe her budding sense of self and the knowledge she gains about her own agency and worth as she builds an intimate relationship with food, growing a self-awareness about her likes and dislikes, and her internal registers for hunger and satiation.

 I can describe how the lessons learned at snack time are linked to future academic success, but as I do so, I wonder, why can’t we appreciate care of children for its own sake?  Why does this language feel artificial and contrived and sorely missing the mark? Why must we commodify children for some future goal? Why do we speak a language that is not our own, while simultaneously complaining that the work of early education and care is misunderstood, unappreciated, and nearly invisible?

By not speaking opening and explicitly about care, I believe we are propagating the false dichotomy that education and care are separate. I am no longer willing to rank care, hide care or disguise care.  I want to name care and show that the most basic rituals of care, which society typically thinks of as custodial, are intellectual encounters.  Whether serving a meal, changing a diaper, wiping a nose, holding a hand, or helping a child put on his mittens, care requires a special kind of intelligence, insight, dignity, respect, presence and dialogue.  A child is learning about himself and others through care. Care offers the first lessons in empathy, perspective-taking, partnership, and human worth. These are not soft skills. This is the knowledge that cannot be categorized, measured and standardized.  Care is the making of humans. Care is the lesson of love, connection, and human dependency deeply embedded in the body and mind of a young child in the present moment. Care is the origin story we all share.

As early childhood educators, we have had a hard time naming what we do because care is so close to us.  In a field that is the domain of women, care is undervalued, expected, and assumed. Sometimes it is so familiar to us that it seems simple and obvious, but it is not.  Care is complicated, profound, and strong.  As first teachers we have an incredible opportunity to examine care, describe care, and lift up care as the seed of human growth and development and self-actualization.   Care offers a way of understanding life.  Care is an ethical model for relationships, happiness and lifelong learning.

As early childhood teachers, I invite you to be ambassadors of care. 
  • I invite you to reflect upon your own worth as you care. 
  • I ask you to examine how you view care, how you talk about care, how you treat care in your essential work with our youngest citizens. 
  • Do you treat some parts of your day, such as story time as more important than other parts of your day, such as rest time and meal time? 
  • Do you see yourself as a teacher while you help a children use the toilet, wash their hands or zip up their coat? 
  • Do you practice care as an honorable human encounter or as a chore?
  • I invite you to join me in an examination of care as we discover new ways to name the pedagogy and practice of care. 

Together, let’s liberate care!
​

 

7 Comments
<<Previous

    Subscribe to Newsletter

    Carol Garboden Murray, M.Ed.



    Archives

    July 2022
    May 2021
    December 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly